Source image / lunar archive watch

Lunar Orbiter source-image lead: a 1967 Moon frame becomes a 5.5 km UFO claim

UFO Sightings Daily has promoted a Lunar Orbiter image from 1967 as a possible large object over the Moon. The concrete item here is the source image reference; the alien-craft conclusion is the source author’s interpretation and needs independent image analysis before it can carry more weight.

Source-provided UFO Sightings Daily image crop/annotation tied to Lunar Orbiter frame 3078; it is a source-lead image, not independent verification of a craft.
Source-provided UFO Sightings Daily image crop/annotation tied to Lunar Orbiter frame 3078; it is a source-lead image, not independent verification of a craft.

The short version

What the report says

The UFO Sightings Daily post lists the date of the photo as Feb. 23, 1967 and the date of discovery as Aug. 22, 2026. It links the claim to a Lunar and Planetary Institute Lunar Orbiter frame page and says a long form appears above or near the lunar surface.

The source compares the apparent feature with Theophilus crater, which it describes as about 110 km across, and uses that comparison to arrive at a 5.5 km estimate. That measurement depends on the source’s assumed geometry and on treating the visible feature as an object rather than an image artifact, terrain feature, processing mark, or shadow.

Media analysis and limits

The available media for this monitor entry is a source-provided crop/annotation from UFO Sightings Daily. The primary LPI frame page was blocked by a browser challenge during this run, so The UAP Trail is preserving the source link while flagging that the original archive frame still needs direct review.

No source video accompanies the item. This article does not embed unrelated Moon footage, and it does not treat the source annotation as proof of a spacecraft.

Why this one is worth tracking

Lunar archive claims can be useful leads when they point readers to a specific frame number that can be checked later.

The item is also a good example of the monitor’s standard: preserve the traceable source details, then separate them from claims that outrun the evidence.

Open questions

Sources